Subtitle:
Former U.S. President warns Canada’s foreign policy stance could derail crucial trade negotiations
News Report:
Former U.S. President Donald Trump has strongly criticized Canada’s reported intention to recognize a Palestinian state, calling it a “dangerous and misguided” move that could strain U.S.-Canada relations and stall ongoing trade talks.
Speaking at a rally in Michigan, Trump didn’t mince words as he took aim at Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s foreign policy approach. “You don’t strike deals while taking sides in a conflict that threatens peace and stability,” Trump said. “If Canada wants to stand with Hamas and Iran, it won’t be standing with the United States.”
The statement comes at a critical moment when both countries are renegotiating elements of their cross-border trade framework. With hundreds of billions of dollars in goods exchanged annually, any diplomatic friction has the potential to spill over into economic ties.
Canada has not officially announced the recognition yet, but several senior officials in Ottawa have hinted that the government is moving toward formally supporting Palestinian statehood—a position aligned with several European nations but increasingly at odds with Washington’s hardline stance, especially under Trump’s influence.
Trump’s remarks have triggered concern in diplomatic circles, as both countries navigate complex trade arrangements in sectors ranging from energy to agriculture. A senior Canadian government official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said, “We remain committed to both a peaceful Middle East and a fair trade partnership with the U.S. These are not mutually exclusive.”
The issue has also divided opinion within Canada. While some advocacy groups and opposition leaders have welcomed the move toward Palestinian recognition, citing the need for a two-state solution, others have warned it could isolate Canada on the international stage and invite backlash from key allies.
With Trump eyeing a return to the White House in 2025, his strong reaction underscores how foreign policy decisions—even by close allies—could play a pivotal role in shaping future U.S. trade policy. As tensions rise, experts say Ottawa may be forced to choose between diplomatic principles and economic pragmatism.